JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)February 21, 2024

A- de 2024

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Paola Andrea Meneses Mosquera

✓Claimant Apoderado Drummond Ltda Y Otros

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Con el presente auto se RECHAZA DE PLANO la solicitud formulada por el apoderado de Drummond, la cual tituló como insistencia en nulidad de la Sentencia T-375/23, por resultar manifiestamente improcedente.

Se dispuso remitir al Juzgado Cuarto Administrativo del Circuito de Valledupar el informe de avance suscrito por el peticionario para acreditar el cumplimiento del referido fallo, para lo de su competencia

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. RECHAZAR DE PLANO la solicitud titulada "INSISTENCIA EN NULIDAD DE SENTENCIA T-375 DE 2023" suscrita por el apoderado de Drummond, por ser manifiestamente improcedente.
  2. Segundo. Por Secretaría General, REMITIR al Juzgado
  3. Cuarto. Administrativo del Circuito de Valledupar el informe de avance suscrito por el apoderado de Drummond para acreditar el cumplimiento de la Sentencia T-375 de 2023. Lo anterior, para lo de su competencia.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela
Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.